Forum Topic

Something Real
MemberGodzillaApril 28, 2014Hello there. I've a question that's been on my mind for a little while now - stemming directly from the many "Godzilla's Gender" threads I've seen popping up across the boards. How can we be certain of Godzilla's biological gender? "He" very well could be a "she". However, it's extremely difficult to tell for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is the creature's overall heavily-scaled and menacing appearance. Not only that, but with the vast majority of large and commanding presences, we traditionally allocate the generic descriptor of "He" - it's a facet of human nature left over from the near stone-age and bronze-age eras in which women were viewed as not quite equal with men. I'm reminded of various, older Dinosaur films hosted by Gary Owens in which the majority of the creatures were described as "He", or a recent event in Madision, WI called "Dinosaurs Roaring In!" in which the predators are often billed as male, while the much larger saurupods are described as female (strangely enough). Look at the Tyranosaurus Rex from Jurassic Park. Though it was referred to by the descriptor of "He", that creature - and every other dinosaur for that matter - was female (at least to start). Is it that we view agression and certitude as masculine? Is the figurative "He" more worthy of being lauded as a dangerous being or commanding presence? With that on the table, I posit this question: what if Godzilla really did happen to be a female of the species? Would that deplete the respect and awe we feel for the creature? Would it in any way diminish the incredibly magnificent figure the creature cuts as it wades through cities and brings destruction down upon the heads of all challengers? Would we still look at Godzilla in the same light if the King of the Monsters was actually the Queen of the Monsters? Nature, of which Godzilla is supposed to be an avatar, is almost always referred to as "Mother Nature" - and we all know that the natural world is the most prolific killer of all. Remember: "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned"? That is a very powerful and telling phrase used by many an individual to describe the dire consequences that can arise from drawing forth a female entity's wrath. Yet, it seems that we (as a general whole) wish to describe most destructive creatures a male. As always, your thoughts and conjecture on this topic are most appreciated, even if you choose to keep them to yourself. :)